James Ming-Hsueh Lee Solo Exhibition

Blind Spot







Blind Spot - James Ming-Hsueh Lee Solo Exhibition


Artist | James Ming-Hsueh Lee

Duration | 07.11.2020 – 08.09.2020 (10:00-19:00 Closed on Mondays)

Opening | 07.11.2020 Sat. 3:00 p.m.

Artist Talk | 07.25.2020 Sat. 3:00 p.m. Talk with Wang Sheng-Hung

Venue | Powen Gallery map


James Ming-Hsueh Lee, born in 1978 in Taiwan, currently resides in Taipei. He had won the first prize of the Taipei Art Awards 2005 and obtained his Ph.D. in Arts from Loughborough University in 2013.


James Ming-Hsueh Lee's artworks focus on everyday items to look for any potential meanings in their artistic contexts. He is exceptionally good at re-interpreting usual elements from our daily surroundings with humorous methods. The objective is to examine our stereotypical understanding of everything from the perspectives of media, education, and social construct. Lee discovers an object's hidden nature from a different perspective and forms an opposite thought from the transformations by reserving the way it is meant to be used, changing its external appearances, or the angle of the viewpoint. The goal is to explore the possibility of contemporary art and to create a different interpretation of a little sensation.


The exhibition's title is "Blind Spot"; its focus is between "To be neglected" and "To be seen". It is an imagination of a "blind spot" by an individual with a voice. It all begins with the visual paradox shown from the literal meaning: it is a state of claiming seeing it yet in fact not seeing it. People value what is shown in front of their eyes when facing things. They indulge in the "present" that can be seen at the moment, and it is accompanied by the inevitable absence that is not pointed out. In other words, during the moment when individuals with voice raising a point, they seem to show other people's blind spots, but they also create their own ones.


The artist uses daily items such as M&M Chocolate, pencils, and batteries to discuss the relationships between identity, languages, and words. There are spots created from the growth and decay of these items; these invisible spots point out an interweaving network that is too difficult to be seen. This network is constructed between the structure of the history itself, a presentation of the space, the analysis of the absence, and the external context.


It seems to be a game for the viewers. A new possibility of point to point might be formed between the viewers guessing the hints and responding to their own experiences. The objective of extrapolating meanings is not to solve the puzzles because the answer simply does not exist. It should be re-understanding and creating through the process of this kind of cognitive transformation.


盲點 - 李明學個展廣告稿.jpg



Cutting a Dotted Line of Thoughts with a Pencil: About “Blind Spot”, James Ming-Hsueh Lee Solo Exhibition


Article by Wang Sheng-Hung


Apelles of Kos is an active Greek painter that lived during the era of Alexandra the Great. There was a story about him challenging his then competitor, Protogenes, to a painting competition where they showed off their skills. In order to boast his outstanding painting skills, Protogenes drew a delicate and masterful line that no one had ever done before. However, Apelles was more skillful, as he drew another finer line over Protogenes’s, thus divided that one line into two.


If the existence of a line always implies the division of a paper or canvas, causing the formation of a border, which creates new relative relationships (intra-territorial and extra-territorial, body and background). Then the meaning of “drawing a line” is never simple because boundary delimitation must be accompanied by the establishment of “law”; which depends on the ability of the portrayer to attach the meaning of order to things or to reconstruct order.


But what Apelles did was a little different. At least in the eyes of Giorgio Agamben, he did not simply draw a finer line that was more skillful than his opponent. Instead, he (re)depicted the practice of depiction. Or to be more precise, the so-called “The Cut of Apelles[1]”, to explain the representational meaning behind a line – the definition and partition of “law” – which is a strategic way to redraw and re-divide boundaries. Through the execution of “divides the divisions”, the original operational logic of the “law” is suspended. It is this method that this legendary Greek painter rendered his opponent’s boundary the loss of its effectiveness.


James Ming–Hsueh Lee’s new solo exhibition “Blindspot” obviously contains his personal version of “divides the divisions” or “redepiction of the depicted”. This exhibition exists a virtual, conceptual line, which penetrates all of his exhibiting works. The pencil is undoubtedly the most important image in the “Blind Spot” exhibition. It symbolizes the traditions of sketching, and for a long time (through the depiction of images), the fundamental way for humans to give meaning to everything: Establish outlines, define foregrounds and backgrounds, and set up various perspective and spatial relationships. However, James Ming–Hsueh Lee has no intention to guide us to understand the way he manages and portrays his subjects, but to garner interest in the “law” by highlighting on the method of representation (No matter if this “law” is in the form of Euclid, Da Vinci, Velasquez, or Foucault.) The pencil stuck out on the window by the gallery's door has fully expressed the artist's intention. The enlarged word "Sword" on the wall is the division of the painted white wall in practice; it is also a physical expression of the triple equation, "pencil line = cutting line = boundary line of the law". Using this piece of artwork as the starting point, the artist playfully uses the breaking and reallocating of various kinds of symbols to toss audiences into an ambiguous realm where the doubt of signification is everywhere. It makes an unstable state of the image and its reappearance to become an issue.


To see it in a bigger picture, "Blind Spot" always has reserved when showing any clear targets of depiction. It only focuses on the clever installations of non-existence. For example, Nameless Exchange Project, it is a piece of artwork that portrays the current issue of the delivery economy on the surface; it invites the audiences to explore the exchanging relationships between "artwork/commodity" and "devotion/giving". But the artwork's installation onsite can also be interpreted from an even more classical point of view: A drink picked up from a green stand, it is the nonpresence of the object in fact; the pictures being recorded on the camera but never developed ever. They are no doubt the absence of the portraits. OOXX on the other side of the exhibition is also using a similar stance: What it presents is only the enlarged pencil version of tic tact toe; it can be completed easily by only a few strokes. If the audiences wish to look for imagery that the artist put more thoughts on, they will only find that the artist seriously painted the tool of depiction (pencil) itself. However, they are all given a secondary status as attachments; they can be described as the remarks of editions and are placed by the side of the canvas where it is hard to notice them.


Obviously, all of these are the suspicions made by James Ming-Hsueh Lee. He constantly leads us to focus on the mechanism of an image's reappearance, and not to focus on the external appearance of an object. It is like a hint from the color dotted artwork, Stardust, located on the wall in the back. All of these dot figures can be the color stains from chocolates, and they can also be seen as simulacra of starry night sky. Yet, the focus should not be on identifying which one is true, or even falling into the misunderstanding of skepticism where every image (or depiction) cannot be trusted. All of these simplified paths for thoughts are points that "Blind Spot" wishes to deliver. More precisely, the goal of this exhibition is to divert people's focus on indulging in reappeared objects and to refocus on the inevitable of symbolic games that must come with the practice of depiction itself. However, it is not a kind of stance that is seclusive with pure subjective aesthetics, but rather to think and explore how to create some kind of agile "reading gap" that is full of potential between the audiences and the settled law of things (those rigid and snobbish law of reality). It is like that when people look up to the stars, their thoughts can always swing between observing in calm and silence and roaming freely. This is more stepping on the "dotted line" rather than on the "solid line", which is commonly referred to as thinking in constellations, and it is in fact the best gift that contemporary art can offer.

[1] Giorgio Agamben, The Time That Remains: A Commentary on the Letter to the Romans, Patricia Diley (Trans.) (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2005), p. 50.